BLUFOR an abbreviation for “Blue Force,” represents one of the key factions in any mission scenario. This faction aligns with NATO, comprising the United States and its European allies, and employs equipment consistent with NATO standards. The term originates from U.S. military exercises where friendly forces are marked in blue, contrasting with the opposition, known as “OPFOR,” often depicted with Soviet-era gear.

BLUFOR’s arsenal spans a diverse range of weaponry and vehicles, reflecting the contributions of various NATO member nations. While comparable in diversity to OPFOR, BLUFOR equipment exhibits distinct characteristics. Their vehicles tend to prioritize agility and speed, while infantry gear emphasizes ease of use and disposability. Moreover, BLUFOR emphasizes vehicle design for enhanced survivability and crew comfort, with advanced optics and guided weaponry being more prevalent.

In community missions, BLUFOR typically engages OPFOR across a spectrum of scenarios, with players predominantly assuming the roles within BLUFOR while the Game Master and AI manage the opposing forces. Though less common, scenarios may occasionally reverse roles, showcasing the flexibility of mission dynamics.

Hostile encounters between BLUFOR factions are infrequent, if not altogether rare, within mission settings.

Definition


The term “BLUFOR,” short for “Blue Force,” is commonly employed in missions and may also surface in briefing materials. Within our community, it serves as a descriptor for any faction exhibiting an official military identity and exclusively utilizing NATO equipment.

Moreover, entities like PMCs or insurgent groups, operating independently as the sole player-controlled faction in a mission, may also be colloquially referred to as “BLUFOR.”

In cooperative missions where members assume the roles of OPFOR, embodying a Soviet-style force, the opposing faction is designated as “BLUFOR” only if it aligns with the aforementioned criteria.

As with always, exceptions to these conventions are feasible.

Historical Background


Following the end of World War II, Europe found itself divided. Eastern Europe fell under the sway of the Soviet Union and its satellite states, while Western Europe regained independence under the protection of the victorious Allied superpowers – the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. However, the fragile alliance between the West and the Soviet Union dissolved almost immediately, with the Western powers anticipating Soviet ambitions to expand further into the continent.

To counter this looming threat, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) emerged as a long-standing military alliance, uniting the United States and most Western European nations in a permanent defensive pact. NATO’s primary mission was to create a formidable defense against any potential Soviet incursion. In response to the Soviet Union’s rapid militarization, NATO pursued technological advancements to maintain a strategic edge.

The diverse array of member nations within NATO translated into a rich variety of equipment and capabilities. Each member state either utilized domestically-produced armaments or acquired American weaponry through subsidized channels. Throughout the Cold War era, NATO succeeded in upholding its technological superiority.

The United States Armed Forces, comprising the largest contingent within NATO, stood at the forefront of technological innovation. Many NATO members adopted American-designed weaponry, often modified to suit their own specifications. Additionally, as part of the alliance’s agreements, the United States maintained substantial military presence across NATO’s eastern frontier, facilitating swift responses to potential Soviet (now Russian) aggression on NATO soil. Nonetheless, the armed forces of other NATO members command considerable strength, remaining among the world’s most formidable military powers.

Weaponry


BLUFOR weaponry boasts a comparable diversity to that of OPFOR, offering models tailored to fulfill virtually any role required on the battlefield. However, distinct emphasis is placed on certain characteristics of BLUFOR weapons and vehicles. Generally, BLUFOR armaments are renowned for their user-friendliness and occasional lightweight construction, often incorporating cutting-edge technology that renders them more modern than their OPFOR counterparts, particularly in terms of optics and guidance systems. Nevertheless, both sides’ arsenals share similarities in capabilities, and when wielded skillfully by players, can prove equally effective.

Below is a categorized list of BLUFOR weaponry, although it may not be exhaustive and is subject to expansion and refinement as Arma continues to evolve.

Small Arms


Anti-Tank Launchers


Grenades


​Heavy Automatics


Cannons


Air Weapons


 

Vehicles


BLUFOR maintains a technological advantage over OPFOR by fielding more advanced equipment both on the ground and in the air. BLUFOR vehicles are typically equipped with superior weapons, enhanced protection for crews, better optics, and more comfortable crew compartments. This advanced technology makes BLUFOR vehicles more expensive and often fewer in number compared to OPFOR’s, though this is less significant in the context of ArmA missions.

Design Philosophy


BLUFOR vehicles are typically designed with more crew comfort features, such as spacious interiors and air-conditioning systems, which are highly valued in real-life military operations. However, in a game like ArmA, these comfort features have no impact on gameplay. The more significant benefit in the game comes from the superior line-of-sight in many BLUFOR vehicles. Crews, especially drivers, benefit from better visibility to make it easier to navigate and spot threats. This is a notable advantage in most BLUFOR vehicles, although there are exceptions, such as older models like the M113, which have more limited visibility.

Another key feature of BLUFOR vehicles, especially tanks and IFVs, is their enhanced protection. Many BLUFOR vehicles are equipped with Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA), which consists of packets of explosives that detonate upon contact with an incoming projectile or rocket, reducing or neutralizing its impact just before it hits the vehicle. Lighter vehicles, such as the Stryker, often feature slat armor, which provides similar protection and are particularly effective against HEAT-tipped anti-tank missiles. Additionally, many BLUFOR vehicles generally carry more armor overall compared to their Soviet counterparts that provides greater protection against enemy fire.

Finally, BLUFOR vehicles are typically equipped with far superior optics compared to their Soviet counterparts. Most BLUFOR Tanks and IFVs are outfitted with advanced thermal vision and/or nightvision equipment, allowing for enhanced situational awareness in low-visibility conditions, such as at night or in smoke. In contrast, only the most modern OPFOR vehicles feature such technologies which gives BLUFOR a notable advantage in terms of target acquisition and overall battlefield awareness.

In exchange for these advantages, BLUFOR vehicles are significantly more expensive to produce and maintain. This results in fewer vehicles being available for the same budget compared to OPFOR forces. While this economic factor doesn’t directly affect missions in a simulated environment, a mission designer may need to consider it when balancing forces to ensure that the difference in vehicle numbers does not disrupt gameplay balance or tactical fairness.

Light Vehicles


Picture

Medium Vehicles


Picture

Heavy Vehicles


Picture

Rotary-Wing


Picture

Fixed-Wing


Picture